US v. Pentzke-Chamorro
| CARLOS MANFREDO PENTZKE-CHAMORRO, a/k/a El Doctor |
| UNITED STATES |
| ORIENTAL BANK and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION |
| 25-2014 |
| October 22, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. District Court Docket entry: DE#500. [25-2014] (GB) [Entered: 03/06/2026 04:39 PM] |
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Carlos Manfredo Pentzke-Chamorro. Brief and Appendix due 04/21/2026 for appellant Carlos Manfredo Pentzke-Chamorro. [25-2014] (GB) [Entered: 02/20/2026 01:01 PM]
|
| MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Carlos Manfredo Pentzke-Chamorro. Served on 02/19/2026. [25-2014] (LRR) [Entered: 02/19/2026 04:55 PM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 02/23/2026 for appellant Carlos Manfredo Pentzke-Chamorro. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [25-2014] (GB) [Entered: 01/13/2026 09:10 AM] |
| NOTICE of filing the following transcript in district court by Court Reporter Joe Reynosa: 10/01/2025, Sentencing Hearing. In accordance with Judicial Conference Policy, the transcript will not be available to the public by remote electronic access for ninety days after the filing date. During that ninety day period, the transcript may be purchased through the court reporter or viewed at the public terminal at the district court. [25-2014] (GB) [Entered: 01/13/2026 09:08 AM] |
| NOTICE issued. The following attorney has failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Clay Rehrig for US. [25-2014] (GB) [Entered: 12/08/2025 10:30 AM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Carlos Manfredo Pentzke-Chamorro filed by Attorney Luis Rafael Rivera Rodriguez. Served on 11/25/2025. [25-2014] (LRR) [Entered: 11/25/2025 03:31 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Carlos Manfredo Pentzke-Chamorro indicating transcripts are being ordered. Served on 11/25/2025. [25-2014] (LRR) [Entered: 11/25/2025 03:32 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Carlos Manfredo Pentzke-Chamorro. Served on 11/25/2025. [25-2014] (LRR) [Entered: 11/25/2025 03:33 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ordered: 10/01/2025, Sentencing. Transcript due 01/26/2026 from Court Reporter Joe Reynosa [25-2014] (GB) [Entered: 11/25/2025 04:51 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. After 12/05/2025, the following attorney will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case unless they register for an appellate ECF account: Clay Rehrig for US. [25-2014] (GB) [Entered: 11/21/2025 11:25 AM] |
|
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file an appearance form, docketing statement and transcript report/order form filed by Appellant Carlos Manfredo Pentzke-Chamorro. Appearance form, Docketing Statement and Transcript report/order form due 11/25/2025 . [25-2014] (GB) [Entered: 11/06/2025 08:27 AM]
|
| MOTION to extend time to file an appearance form, docketing statement and transcript report/order form filed by Appellant Carlos Manfredo Pentzke-Chamorro. Served on 11/05/2025. [25-2014] (LRR) [Entered: 11/05/2025 02:30 PM] |
| CRIMINAL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #456) filed by Appellant Carlos Manfredo Pentzke-Chamorro. Docketing Statement due 11/05/2025. Transcript Report/Order form due 11/05/2025. Appearance form due 11/05/2025. [25-2014] (AL) [Entered: 10/22/2025 11:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
