Covetrus, Inc. v. Taffere
Plaintiff: COVETRUS, INC.
Defendant: AMAN E TAFFERE
Case Number: 25-2173
Filed: December 8, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Defend Trade Secrets Act
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2026 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Covetrus, Inc. filed by Attorney Daniel R. Strader. Served on 06/05/2026. [25-2173] (DRS) [Entered: 06/05/2026 03:04 PM]
June 5, 2026 BRIEF tendered by Appellee Covetrus, Inc.. [25-2173] (DRS) [Entered: 06/05/2026 01:05 PM]
June 5, 2026 MOTION for enlargement of appellee's addendum page limit filed by Appellee Covetrus, Inc. Served on 06/05/2026. [25-2173] CLERK'S NOTE: Relief selection was incorrect. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (DRS) [Entered: 06/05/2026 12:59 PM]
May 15, 2026 NINE (9) paper copies of appellant's brief [ # 6808264-2 ] submitted by Appellant Aman E Taffere. [25-2173] (SRS) [Entered: 05/20/2026 09:26 AM]
May 8, 2026 APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Aman E Taffere. Served on 02/17/2026. Nine paper copies identical to that of the electronically filed brief must be submitted so that they are received by the court on or before 05/15/2026 . Brief due 06/08/2026 for APPELLEE Covetrus, Inc. [25-2173] (AL) [Entered: 05/08/2026 02:56 PM]
May 8, 2026 Opinion or Order ORDER entered by Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge: Defendant-Appellant's Motion for Leave to File Corrected or Substituted Brief is resolved as follows: the brief and addendum attached to the Motion are accepted for filing as the operative opening brief in this appeal. [25-2173] (AL) [Entered: 05/08/2026 02:50 PM]
March 3, 2026 ASSENTED TO MOTION to extend time to file brief filed by Appellee Covetrus, Inc.. Served on 03/03/2026. [25-2173] (PAH) [Entered: 03/03/2026 09:43 AM]
March 3, 2026 Opinion or Order ORDER entered: Appellee Covetrus, Inc.'s March 3, 2026, motion seeking an extension of time to file Appellee's response brief is premature as the appellant's brief has not yet been accepted for filing. Accordingly, the motion is denied without prejudice to refiling once appellant's brief has been accepted for filing. [25-2173] (ATC) [Entered: 03/03/2026 11:44 AM]
March 3, 2026 DISCLOSURE statement filed by Appellee Covetrus, Inc.. Served on 03/03/2026. [25-2173] (ATC) [Entered: 03/03/2026 10:17 AM]
March 3, 2026 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Covetrus, Inc. filed by Attorney Peter A. Hale. Served on 03/03/2026. [25-2173] (PAH) [Entered: 03/03/2026 10:04 AM]
February 23, 2026 APPENDIX filed by Appellant Aman E Taffere. Served on 02/17/2026. [25-2173] (YCC) [Entered: 02/23/2026 04:32 PM]
February 18, 2026 MOTION for leave to file corrected or substituted brief filed by Appellant Aman E Taffere. Served on 02/18/2026. [25-2173] (AET) [Entered: 02/18/2026 08:36 AM]
February 17, 2026 APPENDIX tendered by Appellant Aman E Taffere. Served on 02/17/2026. [25-2173] (AET) [Entered: 02/17/2026 08:18 PM]
February 17, 2026 BRIEF tendered by Appellant Aman E Taffere. [25-2173] (AET) [Entered: 02/17/2026 07:52 PM]
February 17, 2026 BRIEF tendered by Appellant Aman E Taffere. [25-2173] (AET) [Entered: 02/17/2026 06:20 PM]
January 23, 2026 SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entries: #77 - Order granting Motion to Stay; and #78 - Order mooting Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. [25-2173] (ATC) [Entered: 01/23/2026 02:21 PM]
January 5, 2026 BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 02/17/2026 for appellant Aman E Taffere. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [25-2173] (ATC) [Entered: 01/05/2026 02:46 PM]
January 5, 2026 TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Aman E Taffere indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Served on 12/25/2025. [25-2173] CLERK'S NOTE: Party selection was incorrect. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (AET) [Entered: 01/05/2026 07:14 AM]
December 19, 2025 SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entry: #72 - Order Granting Stay of Supplemental Preliminary Injunction. [25-2173] (ATC) [Entered: 12/19/2025 03:46 PM]
December 18, 2025 SUPPLEMENTAL record filed. Docket entry: #70 - Order granting in forma pauperis status on appeal. [25-2173] (ATC) [Entered: 12/18/2025 08:28 AM]
December 18, 2025 Request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Appellant Aman Taffere was granted in the district court by order dated 12/17/2025. [25-2173] (ATC) [Entered: 12/18/2025 08:29 AM]
December 8, 2025 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #62) filed by Appellant Aman Taffere. Transcript Report/Order form and Fee due 12/22/2025 . [25-2173] (ATC) [Entered: 12/08/2025 12:02 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Covetrus, Inc. v. Taffere
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: COVETRUS, INC.
Represented By: Daniel R. Strader
Represented By: Peter A. Hale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMAN E TAFFERE
Represented By: Aman E. Taffere
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?