In Re: Evans
| DAVID HARRISON EVANS |
| MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS |
| 25-8014 |
| May 14, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CERTIFIED mail return receipt card indicating mail was delivered. Document sent: [ # 6741986-2 ]. [25-8014] (AVN) [Entered: 08/27/2025 03:22 PM] |
| JUDGMENT entered by Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge; Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge; and Seth Robert Aframe, Appellate Judge. Disbarred. [25-8014] (AVN) [Entered: 08/08/2025 09:38 AM] |
| CERTIFIED mail receipt showing article number and recipient's address. Document sent: [ # 6741986-2 ]. [25-8014] (AVN) [Entered: 08/08/2025 10:02 AM] |
| CERTIFIED mail return receipt card indicating mail was delivered. Documents sent: [ # 6720850-2 ]. [25-8014] (AVN) [Entered: 05/28/2025 10:21 AM] |
| ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY CASE docketed. Attorney disciplinary proceedings initiated against Respondent David Harrison Evans. Opening forms sent. [25-8014] (AVN) [Entered: 05/14/2025 08:56 AM] |
ORDER to Show Cause entered directing respondent to show cause why an order should not be entered disbarring respondent from the office of attorney and counselor of this court. Show cause order served on respondent via certified mail. Certified mail receipt number: 7022 0410 0001 7384 3163. Show cause response due 06/13/2025 . [25-8014] (AVN) [Entered: 05/14/2025 09:17 AM]
|
| CERTIFIED mail receipt showing article number and recipient's address. Documents sent: [ # 6720850-2 ]. [25-8014] (AVN) [Entered: 05/14/2025 09:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
