US v. Mojica-Rivera
Defendant: JUAN MIGUEL MOJICA-RIVERA, a/k/a Maco
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Case Number: 26-1046
Filed: January 14, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2026 MOTION to extend time to file brief filed by Appellee US in 26-1004, 26-1046. Served on 07/10/2026. [26-1004, 26-1046] (MEU) [Entered: 07/10/2026 05:48 PM]
July 8, 2026 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee US in 26-1004, 26-1046 filed by Attorney Maggie E. Utecht. Served on 07/08/2026. [26-1004, 26-1046] (MEU) [Entered: 07/08/2026 06:10 PM]
June 16, 2026 MOTION concerning documents filed by Appellant Juan Miguel Mojica-Rivera in 26-1004, 26-1046. Served on 06/11/2026. [26-1004, 26-1046]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (AVN) [Entered: 06/16/2026 02:58 PM]
June 15, 2026 MOTION to stay/extension of time while producing evidence filed by Appellant Juan Miguel Mojica-Rivera in 26-1004, 26-1046. Served on 06/08/2026. [26-1004, 26-1046] (AVN) [Entered: 06/15/2026 02:35 PM]
June 9, 2026 APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant Juan Miguel Mojica-Rivera in 26-1004, 26-1046. Number of copies: 1. Brief due 07/10/2026 for APPELLEE United States. [26-1004, 26-1046] (NP) [Entered: 06/10/2026 09:42 AM]
June 2, 2026 Opinion or Order ORDER entered by Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge; Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge; and Joshua D. Dunlap, Appellate Judge: These matters are before the court on Defendant-Appellant Juan M. Mojica-Rivera's letter-motion dated April 23, 2026. We construe that letter-motion as a motion for reconsideration of the March 24, 2026, order denying appointment of counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. See generally Fed. R. App. P. 27(c). The motion is denied . However, the deadline for appellant to file his opening brief is extended to July 15, 2026. As stated in the March 24 order, should appellant wish to rely on one or more district court filings in lieu of filing a brief(s), he may inform the court, in writing and before the deadline for the filing of his opening brief, of his desire to do so; with any such filing, appellant should identify the filings upon which he wishes to rely with as much specificity as possible. Also as stated in the March 24 order, after appellant files his opening brief, the government may renew its motion for summary disposition, may file a new motion for summary disposition, or may file a response brief. [26-1004, 26-1046] (AVN) [Entered: 06/02/2026 02:56 PM]
May 7, 2026 BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 06/16/2026 for appellant Juan Miguel Mojica-Rivera. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [26-1004, 26-1046] (AVN) [Entered: 05/07/2026 02:43 PM]
May 7, 2026 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Juan Miguel Mojica-Rivera in 26-1004, 26-1046. Certificate of service was not included. [26-1004, 26-1046] (AVN) [Entered: 05/07/2026 02:41 PM]
March 24, 2026 Opinion or Order ORDER entered by Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge: Defendant-Appellant Juan M. Mojica-Rivera seeks review of the district court's denial of his motion for sentencing relief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Several motions and matters require attention. First, there are two appeals because both appellant and the attorney appointed to represent him before the district court filed a notice of appeal. The appeals may be duplicative; however, for the moment, the appeals will be consolidated, subject to later revisitation. Second, counsel appointed in the district court pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act ("CJA") has moved to withdraw and requests the appointment of new CJA counsel. To the extent formal leave to withdraw is necessary, counsel's motion to withdraw is granted . Further, we conclude that the appointment of new CJA counsel is not in order. Thus, appellant is proceeding pro se in the appeals. Third, the government's motion for summary disposition is denied , without prejudice to later reassertion of the untimeliness defense, as the court wishes to hear from appellant on the merits before ruling. A briefing schedule will be entered in due course. Should appellant wish to rely on one or more district court filings in lieu of filing a brief(s), he may inform the court, in writing and before the deadline for the filing of his opening brief, of his desire to do so; with any such filing, appellant should identify the filings upon which he wishes to rely with as much specificity as possible. After appellant files his opening brief, the government may renew the current motion for summary disposition, may file a new motion for summary disposition, or may file a response brief. Fourth and finally, no Transcript Order Form has been filed in Appeal 26-1004. A blank copy of the Transcript Order Form will be enclosed with appellant's copy of this order. Appellant should complete and return that form within 14 days of entry of this order. A briefing schedule then can be set. [26-1004, 26-1046] (AVN) [Entered: 03/24/2026 10:00 AM]
March 12, 2026 CERTIFICATE of service for motion to withdraw as counsel and for appointment of counsel [ # 6792662-3 ] filed by Appellant Juan Miguel Mojica-Rivera in 26-1004, 26-1046. Served on 03/11/2026. [26-1004, 26-1046] CLERK'S NOTE: The ECF filer did not select the option that best describes the document. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (MAD) [Entered: 03/12/2026 01:40 PM]
March 11, 2026 MOTION for Attorney Maria A Dominguez to withdraw as counsel and for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Juan Miguel Mojica-Rivera in 26-1004, 26-1046. Served on 03/11/2026. [26-1004, 26-1046] CLERK'S NOTE: Relief selection was incomplete. Correction made by clerk's office. No further action required. (MAD) [Entered: 03/11/2026 03:57 PM]
March 9, 2026 RESPONSE filed pro se by Appellant Juan Miguel Mojica-Rivera in 26-1004, 26-1046 to motion for summary disposition [ # 6786874-2 ]. Served on 03/03/2026. [26-1004, 26-1046] (AVN) [Entered: 03/09/2026 02:38 PM]
February 18, 2026 MOTION to dismiss or for summary disposition filed by Appellee US in 26-1004, 26-1046. Served on 02/18/2026. [26-1004, 26-1046] (JCR) [Entered: 02/18/2026 02:46 PM]
February 2, 2026 TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Juan Miguel Mojica-Rivera indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. [26-1046] (AVN) [Entered: 02/02/2026 03:55 PM]
January 14, 2026 CRIMINAL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #934) filed by Appellant Juan Miguel Mojica-Rivera. Transcript Report/Order form due 01/28/2026 . [26-1046] (AVN) [Entered: 01/14/2026 02:40 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Mojica-Rivera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Juan Carlos Reyes-Ramos
Represented By: Steven Liong-Rodriguez
Represented By: Myriam Yvette Fernandez-Gonzalez
Represented By: William Stephen Muldrow
Represented By: Maggie Elizabeth Utecht
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JUAN MIGUEL MOJICA-RIVERA, a/k/a Maco
Represented By: Juan Miguel Mojica-Rivera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?