Tok v. Nessinger
| EYLEM TOK |
| MICHAEL NESSINGER, Warden and BRIAN A. KYES, United States Marshal, District of Massachusetts |
| 26-1063 |
| January 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| General (Habeas Corpus) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ASSENTED TO MOTION to stay Appellate Proceedings Pending Resolution of Rule 60(b) Motion filed by Appellant Eylem Tok. Served on 07/14/2026. [26-1063] (DAR) [Entered: 07/14/2026 02:07 PM] |
| ASSENTED TO MOTION to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Eylem Tok. Served on 05/01/2026. [26-1063] (EMQ) [Entered: 05/01/2026 12:52 PM] |
ORDER granting motion to extend time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Eylem Tok. Brief and Appendix due 07/17/2026 for appellant Eylem Tok. We are disinclined to grant a request for further enlargement of this deadline. [26-1063] (ATC) [Entered: 05/01/2026 02:05 PM]
|
| NOTICE of filing the following transcript in district court by Court Reporter Lisa Schwam: 10/30/2025, Motion Hearing. In accordance with Judicial Conference Policy, the transcript will not be available to the public by remote electronic access for ninety days after the filing date. During that ninety day period, the transcript may be purchased through the court reporter or viewed at the public terminal at the district court. [26-1063] (ATC) [Entered: 03/31/2026 10:46 AM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief and Appendix due 05/11/2026 for appellant Eylem Tok. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [26-1063] (ATC) [Entered: 03/31/2026 10:49 AM] |
|
ORDER entered: Upon consideration, the motion to withdraw Attorney Lauren S. Zurier as counsel for Respondent-Appellee Michael Nessinger and Respondent Brian A. Kyes is granted. Attorney Zurier is hereby withdrawn as counsel of record, and the parties will continue to be represented by the remaining counsel of record. [26-1063] (ATC) [Entered: 03/12/2026 02:54 PM]
|
| MOTION for Attorney Lauren S. Zurier to withdraw as counsel filed by Not Party Brian A. Kyes and Appellee Michael Nessinger. Served on 03/09/2026. [26-1063] (LSZ) [Entered: 03/09/2026 03:04 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Not Party Brian A. Kyes and Appellee Michael Nessinger filed by Attorney David Lieberman. Served on 02/19/2026. [26-1063] (DML) [Entered: 02/19/2026 12:21 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Eylem Tok. Served on 01/30/2026. [26-1063] (DAR) [Entered: 01/30/2026 03:15 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Eylem Tok indicating transcripts are being ordered. Served on 01/30/2026. [26-1063] (DAR) [Entered: 01/30/2026 03:16 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ordered: 10/30/2025, Motion Hearing. Transcript due 03/31/2026 from Court Reporter Lisa Schwam, Court Reporter. [26-1063] (ATC) [Entered: 01/30/2026 03:37 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Eylem Tok filed by Attorney Emma Quinn-Judge. Served on 01/27/2026. [26-1063] (EMQ) [Entered: 01/27/2026 01:58 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Eylem Tok filed by Attorney David Russcol. Served on 01/27/2026. [26-1063] (DAR) [Entered: 01/27/2026 02:01 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Not Party Brian A. Kyes and Appellee Michael Nessinger filed by Attorney Lauren S. Zurier. Served on 01/21/2026. [26-1063] (LSZ) [Entered: 01/21/2026 10:36 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #41) filed by Appellant Eylem Tok. Docketing Statement, Transcript Report/Order form, and Appearance form due 02/03/2026 . [26-1063] (ATC) [Entered: 01/20/2026 01:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
