McAlexander v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
| DOUG MCALEXANDER |
| HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. |
| 26-1091 |
| January 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Personal Injury - Product Liability |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| STATUS report filed by Appellant Doug McAlexander. Served on 07/06/2026. [26-1091] (GEM) [Entered: 07/06/2026 03:12 PM] |
| STATUS report filed by Appellant Doug McAlexander. Served on 06/02/2026. [26-1091] (GEM) [Entered: 06/02/2026 03:02 PM] |
| STATUS report filed by Appellant Doug McAlexander. Served on 05/04/2026. [26-1091] (GEM) [Entered: 05/04/2026 02:28 PM] |
| STATUS report filed by Appellant Doug McAlexander. Served on 04/06/2026. [26-1091] (GEM) [Entered: 04/06/2026 06:03 PM] |
| STATUS report filed by Appellant Doug McAlexander. Served on 03/05/2026. [26-1091] (GEM) [Entered: 03/05/2026 06:57 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Howmedica Osteonics Corp. filed by Attorney Kim M.Catullo. Served on 02/24/2026. [26-1091] (KMC) [Entered: 02/24/2026 05:52 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Doug McAlexander filed by Attorney George E. McLaughlin. Served on 02/18/2026. [26-1091] (GEM) [Entered: 02/18/2026 01:40 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Doug McAlexander. Served on 02/18/2026. [26-1091] (GEM) [Entered: 02/18/2026 01:42 PM] |
ORDER transmitting to the district court for a ruling. This court has docketed Plaintiff-Appellant Doug McAlexander's notice of appeal from the order of dismissal entered on December 12, 2025, in No. 1:25-cv-10637-IT (D. Mass.) as Appeal No. 26-1091. On January 9, 2026, Plaintiff filed a motion to amend or set aside findings (D.E. 15) and a motion to alter or amend judgment (D.E. 16). Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(i), the notice of appeal does not become effective until the district court disposes of the post-judgment motions. Therefore, Appellant is directed to file a status report by March 6, 2026 and at thirty day intervals thereafter, informing this court of any action taken by the district court on the postjudgment motions. Further, appellant is directed to inform this court whether or not appellant intends to file a notice of appeal or amended notice of appeal from the district court's postjudgment order(s). Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal of this appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). Once the district court rules on the pending motions, it is directed to forward its decision(s) to this court forthwith. [26-1091] (GB) [Entered: 02/04/2026 12:14 PM]
|
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #17) filed by Appellant Doug McAlexander. Appearance form and Docketing Statement due 02/13/2026 . [26-1091] (GB) [Entered: 01/30/2026 09:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: McAlexander v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DOUG MCALEXANDER | |
| Represented By: | George E. McLaughlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. | |
| Represented By: | Kim M. Catullo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
