Piard v. Matewsky, et al
Plaintiff: JOSEPH PIARD, JR.
Defendant: OFFICER STACY MATEWSKY and OFFICER BRAD OSTERGARD
Case Number: 26-1186
Filed: March 2, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2026 MOTION for good cause filed by Appellant Joseph Piard, Jr. Certificate of service was not included. [26-1186] (AL) [Entered: 06/01/2026 11:56 AM]
May 15, 2026 BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 06/24/2026 for appellant Joseph Piard Jr.. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [26-1186] (GRC) [Entered: 05/15/2026 12:59 PM]
May 13, 2026 Opinion or Order ORDER entered: Upon review, it appears that Appellant Joseph Piard is ineligible to bring an appeal in a civil action in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee in installments under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. 1915, because Appellant has filed more than three lawsuits that have been dismissed as frivolous. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), an appellant who has "three strikes" against them may not appeal from a judgment in a civil action without prepaying the full fee unless "under imminent danger of serious physical injury." Accordingly, Appellant is ordered either to pay the full $605 filing fee in the district court and submit proof of having done so, or to show cause in writing why this appeal should be allowed to proceed. The failure to take either action by May 26, 2026 will lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. See 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b).. [26-1186] (GRC) [Entered: 05/13/2026 04:52 PM]
April 22, 2026 TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Joseph Piard, Jr. indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. [26-1186] (GRC) [Entered: 04/24/2026 11:54 AM]
April 3, 2026 NOTICE of default issued. Appellant failed to file a transcript report/order form by the deadline. If transcripts are necessary for this appeal, appellant is directed to file a transcript order form by 04/17/2026. Absent a timely response, this court will set a briefing schedule, if appropriate. [26-1186] (GRC) [Entered: 04/03/2026 03:33 PM]
March 2, 2026 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #63) filed by Appellant Joseph Piard, Jr.. Fee due 03/16/2026. Transcript Report/Order form due 03/16/2026. [26-1186] (AL) [Entered: 03/02/2026 12:59 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Piard v. Matewsky, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOSEPH PIARD, JR.
Represented By: Joseph Piard Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OFFICER STACY MATEWSKY
Represented By: Max A. Bauer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OFFICER BRAD OSTERGARD
Represented By: Max A. Bauer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?