Bakisila v. Blanche
| GLOIRE LELO BAKISILA |
| PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General and TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General |
| 26-1263 |
| March 16, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE issued. [26-1263] (GB) [Entered: 09/01/2026 09:12 AM] |
| JUDGMENT dismissing case in accordance with 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b) and 45.0(a). [26-1263] (ATC) [Entered: 07/09/2026 12:56 PM] |
| NOTICE of default and intent to dismiss issued directing petitioner to file a brief or this case will be dismissed for lack of prosecution in accordance with 1st Cir. R. 45.0(a). Brief due 06/22/2026 . [26-1263] (ATC) [Entered: 06/08/2026 10:27 AM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Petitioner Gloire Lelo Bakisila. Copy of Order entered April 3, 2026. Forwarding address unknown (BOP website indicates defendant is not in BOP custody). [26-1263] (NKR) [Entered: 04/24/2026 09:33 AM] |
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 06/01/2026 for petitioner Gloire Lelo Bakisila. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), respondent's brief will be due 30 days following service of petitioner's brief and petitioner's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of respondent's brief. [26-1263] (ATC) [Entered: 04/22/2026 03:39 PM] |
| ADMINISTRATIVE record. [26-1263] (TS) [Entered: 04/22/2026 02:54 PM] |
ORDER entered by Gustavo A. Gelp , Jr., Appellate Judge; Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge; and Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge: By order entered March 27, 2026, the court denied Petitioner Gloire Lelo Bakisila's motion for stay of removal. Petitioner now has filed an "Emergency Motion to Extend Stay of Removal Pending Disposition of Petition for Review." We construe that filing as a motion for reconsideration of the March 27 order, and, upon consideration of the arguments set out in the motion, we conclude that reconsideration is not in order. The motion is denied . [26-1263] (ATC) [Entered: 04/03/2026 08:24 AM]
|
| EMERGENCY MOTION to extend stay of removal pending disposition of petition for review filed by Petitioner Gloire Lelo Bakisila. Certificate of service was not included. [26-1263] (ATC) [Entered: 04/02/2026 03:34 PM] |
| Public docket note: Pursuant to Fed. R. App. 43(c)(2), Pamela Bondi has been substituted by Todd Blanche as Acting Attorney General. [26-1263] (ATC) [Entered: 04/02/2026 05:13 PM] |
| NOTICE of intent to remove petitioner filed by Respondent Pamela J. Bondi. Petitioner is scheduled for removal on or after 04/05/2026. Served on 03/30/2026. [26-1263] (JF) [Entered: 03/30/2026 01:40 PM] |
ORDER entered by Gustavo A. Gelp , Jr., Appellate Judge; Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge; and Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge: Petitioner Gloire Lelo Bakisila ("petitioner") seeks a stay of removal pending the resolution of his petition for review. Because petitioner has not made the required "strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits" of his petition, Nken v. Holder , 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009), the request for a stay of removal is denied . The administrative stay previously entered pursuant to Local Rule 18.0 is vacated. Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted . [26-1263] (ATC) [Entered: 03/27/2026 05:07 PM]
|
| EMERGENCY MOTION to extend stay of removal pending adjudication of petition for review filed by Petitioner Gloire Lelo Bakisila. Served on 03/27/2026. [26-1263] (ATC) [Entered: 03/27/2026 03:45 PM] |
ORDER entered: Upon consideration, the motion to withdraw Attorney Bernard Joseph and Attorney Anthony P. Nicastro as counsel for Respondent is granted. Attorney Bernard Joseph and Attorney Anthony P. Nicastro are hereby withdrawn as counsel in this petition for review, and Respondent will continue to be represented by the remaining counsel of record. [26-1263] (ATC) [Entered: 03/18/2026 09:43 AM]
|
| MOTION for substitution of counsel filed by Respondent Pamela J. Bondi. Served on 03/17/2026. [26-1263] (JF) [Entered: 03/17/2026 05:58 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Respondent Pamela J. Bondi filed by Attorney Joyce Fondong. Served on 03/17/2026. [26-1263] (JF) [Entered: 03/17/2026 02:49 PM] |
| NOTICE regarding application of Local Rule 18.0. [26-1263] (ATC) [Entered: 03/16/2026 04:37 PM] |
ORDER entered: Petitioner has filed a motion to stay removal. This order is issued in accordance with First Circuit Local Rule 18.0. Removal of the petitioner is hereby stayed for ten business days from the date of this order. The government shall file its response to the motion in accordance with the Local Rule. [26-1263] (ATC) [Entered: 03/16/2026 04:47 PM]
|
| MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Gloire Lelo Bakisila. Certificate of service was not included. [26-1263] (ATC) [Entered: 03/16/2026 04:41 PM] |
| EMERGENCY MOTION to stay removal filed by Petitioner Gloire Lelo Bakisila. Certificate of service was not included. [26-1263] (ATC) [Entered: 03/16/2026 04:40 PM] |
| AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Gloire Lelo Bakisila. Administrative record due 04/27/2026 . Copy of petition served on respondent(s) pursuant to FRAP 15(c). [26-1263]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to attach a missing document. (ATC) [Entered: 03/16/2026 04:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
ORDER entered by Gustavo A. Gelp , Jr., Appellate Judge; Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge; and Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge: By order entered March 27, 2026, the court denied Petitioner Gloire Lelo Bakisila's motion for stay of removal. Petitioner now has filed an "Emergency Motion to Extend Stay of Removal Pending Disposition of Petition for Review." We construe that filing as a motion for reconsideration of the March 27 order, and, upon consideration of the arguments set out in the motion, we conclude that reconsideration is not in order. The motion is denied . [26-1263] (ATC) [Entered: 04/03/2026 08:24 AM]