US v. Roldan-Cortes
| LUIS ROLDAN-CORTES, a/k/a Wisi |
| UNITED STATES |
| POLICE DEPARTMENT OF PUERTO RICO, FRANK D. INSERNI-MILAM and JOHN DOE |
| 26-1265 |
| March 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER transmitting notice of appeal to the district court for a ruling. [26-1265] (GRC) [Entered: 05/15/2026 03:01 PM]
|
| NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Hector A. Deliz for John Doe and Nancy Santiago Otero for Police Department of Puerto Rico. [26-1265] (GRC) [Entered: 05/01/2026 03:15 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Luis Roldan-Cortes indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. [26-1265] (GRC) [Entered: 04/28/2026 04:55 PM] |
| Mail returned as undeliverable to Attorney Hector A. Deliz for Not Party John Doe. Copy of Order entered April 15, 2026. [26-1265] (NKR) [Entered: 04/30/2026 11:53 AM] |
| NOTICE of default issued. Appellant failed to file a transcript report/order form by the deadline. If transcripts are necessary for this appeal, appellant is directed to file a transcript order form by 04/29/2026. Absent a timely response, this court will set a briefing schedule, if appropriate. [26-1265] (GRC) [Entered: 04/15/2026 04:52 PM] |
| CRIMINAL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #1921) filed by Appellant Luis Roldan-Cortes. Transcript Report/Order form due 04/08/2026. Fee due 04/08/2026. [26-1265] (GRC) [Entered: 03/25/2026 10:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
