Universitas Education, LLC v. Carpenter
| UNIVERSITAS EDUCATION, LLC |
| LILLIAN GRANDERSON, as successor to Jack E. Robinson, III |
| JACK E. ROBINSON, III |
| LOEB & LOEB LLP |
| DANIEL E. CARPENTER |
| 26-1279 |
| March 25, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| RICO |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CITATION of supplemental authorities pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) filed by Appellant Daniel E. Carpenter. Served on 07/27/2026. [26-1279] (DEC) [Entered: 07/27/2026 09:06 AM] |
| RESPONSE filed by Appellant Daniel E. Carpenter to order regarding untimely appeal [ # 6815029-2 ]. Served on 06/16/2026. [26-1279] (DEC) [Entered: 06/16/2026 01:38 PM] |
| Filing fee was paid in the district court by Appellant Daniel E. Carpenter on 04/13/2026. [26-1279] (JW) [Entered: 06/08/2026 05:06 PM] |
ORDER to Show Cause entered. Interested Party-Appellant Daniel E. Carpenter, filed a notice of appeal (DE # 320) on February 25, 2026, challenging the October 10, 2025, (DE # 301) order denying his motion for reconsideration, and the final judgment entered on October 20, 2025 (DE # 306), in Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-11848-DJC (D. Mass.). Upon review of the record in this case, it appears that this appeal should be dismissed as untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (notice of appeal in civil case must be filed within thirty days of judgment or order appealed from). Furthermore, it appears that this court may not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal because nonparties do not have standing to appeal the district court judgment listed in Carpenter's Notice of Appeal. See Microsystems Software, Inc. v. Scandinavia Online AB , 226 F.3d 35, 40, 43 (1st Cir. 2000) (holding that "non-parties who have had the opportunity to seek intervention, but have eschewed that course, lack standing to appeal" and noting that "exceptions to the rule mandating party status . . . are few and far between"). Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that Appellant either move for voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) or show cause, in writing, why this appeal should not be dismissed. The failure to take either action by June 17, 2026 , may lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. See 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). [26-1279] (JW) [Entered: 06/03/2026 12:08 PM]
|
| COURTESY COPY of Citation of supplemental authorities pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) filed by Appellant Daniel E. Carpenter. Number of coipes: 3. [26-1279] (JW) [Entered: 05/21/2026 07:10 PM] |
| CITATION of supplemental authorities pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) filed by Appellant Daniel E. Carpenter. Served on 05/20/2026. [26-1279] (DEC) [Entered: 05/20/2026 06:15 PM] |
| NOTICE issued. The following attorneys have failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Seth L. Marcus for Jack E. Robinson, III, Jennifer A. Pedevillano for Lillian Granderson, Oscar L. Suarez for Lillian Granderson and Jeraldine Williams for Lillian Granderson. [26-1279] (JW) [Entered: 05/06/2026 03:31 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Daniel E. Carpenter indicating transcripts are not necessary for this appeal. Served on 04/07/2026. [26-1279] (DEC) [Entered: 04/07/2026 02:49 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #320) filed by Appellant Daniel E. Carpenter. Transcript Report/Order form and Fee due 04/08/2026. [26-1279] (JW) [Entered: 03/25/2026 07:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
ORDER to Show Cause entered. Interested Party-Appellant Daniel E. Carpenter, filed a notice of appeal (DE # 320) on February 25, 2026, challenging the October 10, 2025, (DE # 301) order denying his motion for reconsideration, and the final judgment entered on October 20, 2025 (DE # 306), in Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-11848-DJC (D. Mass.). Upon review of the record in this case, it appears that this appeal should be dismissed as untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (notice of appeal in civil case must be filed within thirty days of judgment or order appealed from). Furthermore, it appears that this court may not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal because nonparties do not have standing to appeal the district court judgment listed in Carpenter's Notice of Appeal. See Microsystems Software, Inc. v. Scandinavia Online AB , 226 F.3d 35, 40, 43 (1st Cir. 2000) (holding that "non-parties who have had the opportunity to seek intervention, but have eschewed that course, lack standing to appeal" and noting that "exceptions to the rule mandating party status . . . are few and far between"). Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that Appellant either move for voluntary dismissal under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) or show cause, in writing, why this appeal should not be dismissed. The failure to take either action by June 17, 2026 , may lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. See 1st Cir. R. 3.0(b). [26-1279] (JW) [Entered: 06/03/2026 12:08 PM]