US v. Nagle
| LAWRENCE MICHAEL NAGLE, JR., a/k/a Mikey |
| UNITED STATES |
| U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee on behalf of PRP 2022-NMQ1 Trust |
| 26-1324 |
| April 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER appointing counsel. The court appoints Attorney Eamonn Robert Corkery Hart for Lawrence Michael Nagle Jr., in case 26-1324. Transcript Report/Order Form due 06/08/2026. [26-1324] (KPC) [Entered: 05/18/2026 04:34 PM]
|
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Lawrence Michael Nagle, Jr. filed by Attorney Jennifer A. Sunderland. Served on 04/21/2026. [26-1324] (JAS) [Entered: 04/21/2026 04:19 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Lawrence Michael Nagle, Jr.. Served on 04/21/2026. [26-1324] (JAS) [Entered: 04/21/2026 04:27 PM] |
| CJA FORM 24 and transcript order form filed by Appellant Lawrence Michael Nagle, Jr.. Served on 04/21/2026. [26-1324] (JAS) [Entered: 04/21/2026 04:50 PM] |
| CJA FORM 24 and transcript order form filed by Appellant Lawrence Michael Nagle, Jr.. Served on 04/21/2026. [26-1324] (JAS) [Entered: 04/21/2026 04:52 PM] |
| FORM for selection of counsel on appeal filed by Appellant Lawrence Michael Nagle, Jr. requesting the appointment of new counsel. Served on 04/21/2026. [26-1324] (JAS) [Entered: 04/21/2026 04:53 PM] |
| CRIMINAL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #1172) filed by Appellant Lawrence Michael Nagle, Jr. Appearance form, Docketing Statement, and Transcript Report/Order form due 04/21/2026. [26-1324] (JW) [Entered: 04/07/2026 09:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
