US v. Cotto-Cruz
| CARLOS MANUEL COTTO-CRUZ, a/k/a Wasa |
| UNITED STATES |
| 26-1339 |
| April 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER appointing counsel. The court appoints Attorney Ra l S. Mariani-Franco for Carlos Manuel Cotto-Cruz, in case 26-1339. Transcript Report/Order Form due 06/04/2026. [26-1339] (KPC) [Entered: 05/14/2026 10:55 AM]
|
| FORM for selection of counsel on appeal filed by Appellant Carlos Manuel Cotto-Cruz requesting the appointment of new counsel. Served on 04/21/2026. [26-1339] (FJA) [Entered: 04/21/2026 12:10 PM] |
| NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Carlos Manuel Cotto-Cruz filed by Attorney Francisco J. Adams-Quesada. Served on 04/15/2026. [26-1339] (FJA) [Entered: 04/15/2026 08:55 PM] |
| DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Carlos Manuel Cotto-Cruz. Served on 04/15/2026. [26-1339] (FJA) [Entered: 04/15/2026 08:57 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Carlos Manuel Cotto-Cruz indicating all necessary transcripts have already been filed in district court. Served on 04/15/2026. [26-1339] (FJA) [Entered: 04/15/2026 08:58 PM] |
| CJA FORM 24 and transcript order form filed by Appellant Carlos Manuel Cotto-Cruz. Served on 04/15/2026. [26-1339] (FJA) [Entered: 04/15/2026 08:59 PM] |
| CRIMINAL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #260) filed by Appellant Carlos Manuel Cotto-Cruz. Docketing Statement, Transcript Report/Order form, and Appearance form due 04/15/2026 . [26-1339] (ATC) [Entered: 04/01/2026 04:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
