Lettieri v. Huggins, et al
| DAVID CARMINE LETTIERI |
| MARSHAL, EVENING CORRECTION OFFICER, May 23, 2025, D. WIGGINS, DISCIPLINE HEARING OFFICER, B. LINNATU, D. ENGLISH, S. GONDALAZ, MAEVE EILEEN HUGGINS, MICHAEL J. ROEMER, LAWRENCE JOSEPH VILARDO, PAUL E. BONANNO, RANDALL E. GARVER, MENGUN A. JOSLASH, MARYBETH COVERT, JEFFREY F. BAYLEY and BRIAN P. COMERFORD |
| 26-1420 |
| April 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Civil Rights (Habeas Corpus) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE issued. The following attorney has failed to register for an appellate ECF account and will no longer receive notice of court issued documents in this case: Tiffany H. Lee for Lawrence Joseph Vilardo, Michael J. Roemer, Maeve Eileen Huggins, Paul E. Bonanno, Randall E. Garver, Mengun A. Joslash, MaryBeth Covert, Jeffrey F. Bayley and Brian P. Comerford. [26-1420] (GB) [Entered: 05/18/2026 01:39 PM] |
| RESPONSE filed by Appellant David Carmine Lettieri to the court's order [ # 6807582-2 ]. Certificate of service was not included. [26-1420] (GB) [Entered: 05/18/2026 04:10 PM] |
| PLEADING tendered: Appellant's brief filed by Appellant David Carmine Lettieri addressed to Appellee Paul E. Bonanno. Number of copies: 1. [26-1420]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (NP) [Entered: 05/20/2026 01:25 PM] |
| PLEADING tendered: Appellant's brief filed by Appellant David Carmine Lettieri addressed to Appellee Maeve Elieen Huggins. Number of copies: 1. [26-1420] (NP) [Entered: 05/20/2026 01:36 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant David Carmine Lettieri. Number of copies: 1. Brief due for APPELLEES Jeffrey F. Bayley, Paul E. Bonanno, Brian P. Comerford, MaryBeth Covert, Discipline Hearing Officer, D. English, Evening Correction Officer, Randall E. Garver, S. Gondalaz, Maeve Eileen Huggins, Mengun A. Joslash, B. Linnatu, Marshal, Michael J. Roemer, Lawrence Joseph Vilardo and D. Wiggins. [26-1420] (GB) [Entered: 05/21/2026 06:20 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF filed by Appellant David Carmine Lettieri. Number of copies: 1.. [26-1420] (GB) [Entered: 05/21/2026 06:27 PM] |
ORDER entered. Upon review, it appears that Appellant David C. Lettieri is ineligible to bring an appeal in a civil action in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee in installments under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. 1915, because Appellant has filed more than three lawsuits that have been dismissed as frivolous. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), an appellant who has "three strikes" against them may not appeal from a judgment in a civil action without prepaying the full fee unless "under imminent danger of serious physical injury." Accordingly, Appellant is ordered either to pay the full $605 filing fee in the district court and submit proof of having done so, or to show cause in writing why this appeal should be allowed to proceed. The failure to take either action by May 20, 2026 will lead to dismissal of the appeal for lack of diligent prosecution. [26-1420] (GB) [Entered: 05/06/2026 02:01 PM]
|
| BRIEFING schedule set. Brief due 06/15/2026 for appellant David Carmine Lettieri. Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31(a), appellee's brief will be due 30 days following service of appellant's brief and appellant's reply brief will be due 21 days following service of appellee's brief. [26-1420] (GB) [Entered: 05/06/2026 02:06 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #6) filed by Appellant David Carmine Lettieri. Fee due 05/13/2026 . [26-1420] (GB) [Entered: 04/29/2026 03:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
