Spencer v. Bracey
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY SPENCER
Defendant: ROBERT BRACEY, individually, and as a Health Inspector for the Town of North Reading and SHELLEY J. NEWHOUSE, individually, and as Health Inspector for the Town of Wilmington
Case Number: 26-1588
Filed: May 20, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2026 TRANSCRIPT ordered: 02/26/2026, Motion Hearing. Transcript due 08/03/2026 from Court Reporter Jennifer Vaillancourt. [26-1588] (ATC) [Entered: 06/03/2026 08:45 AM]
June 2, 2026 TRANSCRIPT report/order form filed by Appellant Timothy Spencer indicating transcripts are being ordered. Served on 06/02/2026. [26-1588] (RCC) [Entered: 06/02/2026 07:17 PM]
May 25, 2026 DOCKETING statement filed by Appellant Timothy Spencer. Served on 05/25/2026. [26-1588] (RCC) [Entered: 05/25/2026 06:54 PM]
May 20, 2026 CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #65) filed by Appellant Timothy Spencer. Docketing Statement, Transcript Report/Order form, and Appearance form due 06/03/2026 . [26-1588] (ATC) [Entered: 05/20/2026 09:30 AM]
May 20, 2026 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Robert Bracey filed by Attorney Douglas I. Louison. Served on 05/20/2026. [26-1588] (DIL) [Entered: 05/20/2026 12:42 PM]
May 20, 2026 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellee Robert Bracey filed by Attorney Joseph A. Mongiardo, Esquire. Served on 05/20/2026. [26-1588] (JAM) [Entered: 05/20/2026 12:45 PM]
May 20, 2026 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Timothy Spencer filed by Attorney Richard C. Chambers Jr. Served on 05/20/2026. [26-1588] CLERK'S NOTE: The name of the ECF Filer must be preceded by an "s/" and typed in the space where the signature would otherwise appear. THE FILER IS DIRECTED TO RE-FILE THE DOCUMENT WITHIN TWO DAYS (05/22/2026). (RCC) [Entered: 05/20/2026 04:50 PM]
May 20, 2026 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Timothy Spencer filed by Attorney Richard C. Chambers Jr.. Served on 05/20/2026. [26-1588] (RCC) [Entered: 05/20/2026 05:04 PM]
May 20, 2026 NOTICE of appearance on behalf of Appellant Timothy Spencer filed by Attorney Joseph Spinale, Esquire. Served on 05/20/2026. [26-1588] (JS) [Entered: 05/20/2026 05:08 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Spencer v. Bracey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY SPENCER
Represented By: Joseph Spinale
Represented By: Richard Cullin Chambers Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT BRACEY, individually, and as a Health Inspector for the Town of North Reading
Represented By: Joseph Anthony Mongiardo
Represented By: Douglas I. Louison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHELLEY J. NEWHOUSE, individually, and as Health Inspector for the Town of Wilmington
Represented By: Daniel Greg Skrip
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?