In Re: Kalkey
| REGINA KALKEY |
| EUROMODAS, INC., PRPB, LLC, PRPB NORTE, INC., PRPB OESTE, LLC, JUAN C. CASTIEL, MARILU MARRERO and COMPANY ABC |
| VICTOR MANUEL RIVERA-RIOS |
| 26-1746 |
| June 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER entered by Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge: Petitioner in this closed mandamus case moves to file an IFP affidavit under seal and ex parte. Petitioner having not demonstrated a sufficient justification for ex parte treatment, the motion is denied and the materials provisionally tendered under seal and ex parte shall be returned to petitioner. [26-1746] (GRC) [Entered: 08/03/2026 11:06 AM]
|
| PLEADING tendered: affidavit and motion for in forma pauperis filed EX PARTE (provisionally) by Petitioner Regina Kalkey. [26-1746] (GRC) [Entered: 07/24/2026 05:12 PM] |
| MOTION to file document under seal and ex parte filed by Petitioner Regina Kalkey. [26-1746] (GRC) [Entered: 07/24/2026 05:10 PM] |
| JUDGMENT entered by David J. Barron, Chief Appellate Judge; Gustavo A. Gelp , Jr., Appellate Judge and Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge. Denied. [26-1746] (GRC) [Entered: 06/24/2026 12:35 PM] |
| CASE submitted. Panel: David J. Barron, Chief Appellate Judge; Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr., Appellate Judge; Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge. [26-1746] (SBT) [Entered: 07/08/2026 02:44 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING docketed. Petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Regina Kalkey. Fee due 07/08/2026. [26-1746] (GRC) [Entered: 06/24/2026 11:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
