Fortune v. NH Department of Safety, et al
| WILLIAM E. FORTUNE |
| NH DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, DMV, Administration, Financial Responsibility Division, KELLY AYOTTE, Governor, New Hampshire, NATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU, INC., STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE and FARMERS INSURANCE |
| 26-1990 |
| September 3, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to reconsider order [ # 6843904-2 ] [ # 6843887-2 ] filed by Appellant William E. Fortune. [26-1636, 26-1990] (GRC) [Entered: 10/13/2026 12:01 PM] |
ORDER entered by Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge. Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. [26-1990] (GB) [Entered: 09/23/2026 09:52 AM]
|
|
ORDER entered by David J. Barron, Chief Appellate Judge; Lara E. Montecalvo, Appellate Judge and Julie Rikelman, Appellate Judge, denying motion for injunction pending appeal. [26-1990] (JMK) [Entered: 09/15/2026 02:34 PM]
|
| MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant William E. Fortune. [26-1636, 26-1990] (GRC) [Entered: 09/16/2026 10:20 AM] |
| MOTION for injuction relief filed by Appellant William E. Fortune. [26-1636, 26-1990] (GRC) [Entered: 09/14/2026 10:57 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE docketed. Notice of appeal (doc. #48) filed by Appellant William E. Fortune. [26-1990] (DO) [Entered: 09/03/2026 09:24 AM] |
| Request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Appellant William E. Fortune in 26-1990, 26-1636 was granted in the district court by order dated 08/28/2026. [26-1990, 26-1636] (DO) [Entered: 09/03/2026 09:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
