In Re: Duarte
| JESSE W. DUARTE |
| MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT, MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS and RI SUPREME COURT |
| 26-8024 |
| May 6, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Certified Mail returned as undeliverable to Respondent Jesse W. Duarte at: 127 Dorrance St, Providence, RI 02903. Copy of Order to Show Cause entered May 6, 2026. Certified mail receipt number: 7022 0410 0001 7384 3910. [26-8024]. CLERK'S NOTE: Docket entry was edited to modify the docket text. (NKR) [Entered: 06/01/2026 09:07 AM] |
| CERTIFIED mail return receipt card indicating mail was delivered to: Almagno Law, 10 Rangeley Rd, Cranston, RI 02920. Document(s) sent: [ # 6807412-2 ]. [26-8024] (ATC) [Entered: 05/18/2026 03:04 PM] |
| ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY CASE docketed. Attorney disciplinary proceedings initiated against Respondent Jesse W. Duarte. Opening forms sent. [26-8024] (ATC) [Entered: 05/06/2026 09:31 AM] |
ORDER to Show Cause entered directing respondent to show cause why an order should not be entered suspending respondent from the office of attorney and counselor of this court. Show cause order served on respondent via certified mail. Certified mail receipt numbers: 7022 0410 0001 7384 3927; 7022 0410 0001 7384 3606; 7022 0410 0001 7384 3910. Show cause response due 06/05/2026 . [26-8024] (ATC) [Entered: 05/06/2026 09:40 AM]
|
| CERTIFIED mail receipts showing article numbers and recipient's addresses. Documents sent: [ # 6807412-2 ]. [26-8024] (ATC) [Entered: 05/06/2026 09:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
