In Re: Branson
| JOHN HAYES BRANSON |
| ME SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT |
| 26-8035 |
| June 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Certified Mail returned as undeliverable to Respondent John Hayes Branson. Copy of Order to Show Cause entered July 14, 2026. Certified mail receipt number: 7022 0410 0001 7384 4115. [26-8035] (NKR) [Entered: 08/03/2026 12:46 PM] |
| Certified Mail returned as undeliverable to Respondent John Hayes Branson. Copy of Order to Show Cause entered July 14, 2026. Certified mail receipt number: 7022 0410 0001 7384 4108. [26-8035] (NKR) [Entered: 08/03/2026 12:40 PM] |
ORDER* to Show Cause entered directing respondent to show cause why an order should not be entered suspending respondent from the office of attorney and counselor of this court. Show cause order served on respondent via certified mail. Certified mail receipt number: 7022 0410 0001 7384 4108 and 7022 0410 0001 7384 4115. Any show cause response is due on or before Thursday, August 13, 2026 . A hearing may be requested within thirty (30) days after service of this order. Absent a request for a hearing, the matter will be decided on the papers. *Order reissued as initial mailing was returned due to insufficient postage. [26-8035] (AVN) [Entered: 07/14/2026 04:17 PM]
|
| CERTIFIED mail receipt showing article number and recipient's address. Document(s) sent: [ # 6825958-2 ]. [26-8035] (AVN) [Entered: 07/14/2026 04:21 PM] |
| Certified Mail returned as undeliverable to Respondent John Hayes Branson. Copy of Order to Show Cause entered July 1, 2026. Certified mail receipt numbers: 7022 0410 0001 7384 4078. [26-8035] (NKR) [Entered: 07/13/2026 04:39 PM] |
|
ORDER to Show Cause entered directing respondent to show cause why an order should not be entered suspending respondent from the office of attorney and counselor of this court. Show cause order served on respondent via regular and certified mail. Certified mail receipt numbers: 7022 0410 0001 7384 4078 and 7022 0410 0001 7384 4061. Any show cause response is due on or before Friday, July 31, 2026 . A hearing may be requested within thirty (30) days after service of this order. Absent a request for a hearing, the matter will be decided on the papers. [26-8035] (AL) [Entered: 07/01/2026 10:42 AM]
|
| CERTIFIED mail receipt showing article number and recipient's address. Document(s) sent: Show Cause Order [ # 6822414-2 ]. [26-8035] (AL) [Entered: 07/01/2026 03:24 PM] |
| ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY CASE docketed. Attorney disciplinary proceedings initiated against Respondent John Hayes Branson. Opening forms sent. [26-8035] (AL) [Entered: 07/01/2026 09:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In Re: Branson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: JOHN HAYES BRANSON | |
| Represented By: | John Hayes Branson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Interested party: ME SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT | |
| Represented By: | ME Supreme Judicial Court |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
