Torres-Ledesma v. Barr
JUAN MANUEL TORRES-LEDESMA |
WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General |
19-9530 |
May 23, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
[10655518] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Gregory A. Pennington, Jr. for Mr. William P. Barr. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 06/13/2019. Manner of Service: email, US mail [19-9530] [Entered: 06/13/2019 08:02 AM] |
[10655502] Entry of appearance submitted by Gregory A. Pennington for Respondent Mr. William P. Barr for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 06/13/2019. Manner of Service: US mail. [19-9530] [Edited to remove PDF as pleading has been filed-- Edited 06/13/2019 by NA] GAP [Entered: 06/13/2019 07:27 AM] |
[10654982] Agency record filed. Number of volumes filed: 2. [19-9530] TS [Entered: 06/11/2019 12:25 PM] |
[10654989] Minute order filed - Petitioner's brief due on 07/22/2019 for Juan Manuel Torres-Ledesma. (Text Only - No Attachment) [19-9530] [Entered: 06/11/2019 12:32 PM] |
[10654342] Notice issued. Notice of appearance due on 06/17/2019 for William P. Barr. [19-9530] [Entered: 06/07/2019 01:59 PM] |
[10654149] Entry of appearance filed by Mr. Lawrence Edwin Davis for Mr. Juan Manuel Torres-Ledesma. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 06/06/2019. Manner of Service: US mail, email. [19-9530] [Entered: 06/07/2019 07:16 AM] |
[10654145] Docketing statement filed by Mr. Juan Manuel Torres-Ledesma. Served on 06/06/2019. Manner of Service: email, US mail. [19-9530] LED [Entered: 06/06/2019 05:51 PM] |
[10654146] Entry of appearance submitted by Lawrence Edwin Davis for Petitioner Mr. Juan Manuel Torres-Ledesma for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 06/06/2019. Manner of Service: email, US mail. --[Edited 06/07/2019 by SDS to remove pdf from entry as the pleading has been filed] [19-9530] LED [Entered: 06/06/2019 05:54 PM] |
Fee paid for petition for review by Mr. Juan Manuel Torres-Ledesma. Fee Amount: $500.00 Receipt Number: A10-46101-412. [19-9530] LED [Entered: 06/05/2019 03:10 PM] |
[10651101] Petition for review filed. Served on 05/23/2019. Manner of Service: email - Attorney for Respondents: DOH/EOIR/BIA, Oil, Tyler. Copy of petition served on party at address shown in 05/23/2019 letter. Docketing statement and fee due 06/06/2019 for Juan Manuel Torres-Ledesma. Agency record due 07/02/2019 for William P. Barr. Notice of appearance due on 06/06/2019 for William P. Barr and Juan Manuel Torres-Ledesma. [19-9530] [Entered: 05/23/2019 03:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Torres-Ledesma v. Barr | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General | |
Represented By: | Lansing W. Tyler |
Represented By: | DOH/EOIR/BIA |
Represented By: | Oil Oil |
Represented By: | Gregory A. Pennington Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: JUAN MANUEL TORRES-LEDESMA | |
Represented By: | Lawrence Edwin Davis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.