Carranza-Lopez v. Barr
| LUIS ROGELIO CARRANZA-LOPEZ |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General |
| 20-9583 |
| July 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10756764] Jurisdiction challenged. Response due on 08/11/2020 for Luis Rogelio Carranza-Lopez. Failure to file a timely response may result in dismissal without further notice. [20-9583] [Entered: 07/21/2020 09:53 AM] |
| [10756538] Entry of appearance filed by Ms. Elizabeth Fitzgerald-Sambou for Mr. William P. Barr. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 07/20/2020. Manner of Service: US Mail.--[Edited 07/20/2020 by LAB to correct method of service.] [20-9583] [Entered: 07/20/2020 03:33 PM] |
| [10756525] Entry of appearance submitted by Elizabeth K. Fitzgerald-Sambou for Respondent Mr. William P. Barr for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 07/20/2020. Manner of Service: US mail.--[Edited 07/20/2020 by LAB to remove PDF from entry as pleading was filed 7/20/20.] [20-9583] EF [Entered: 07/20/2020 03:16 PM] |
| [10756394] Petition for review filed. Served on 07/15/2020. Manner of Service: US mail - Attorney for Respondents: DOH/EOIR/BIA, General Counsel, Oil, Tyler. Copy of petition served on party at address shown in 07/20/2020 letter. Fee pd:Check #: money order, Receipt #: TBD, Amount: $ $500. Notice of appearance due on 08/03/2020 for William P. Barr, and Notice of appearance due on 08/19/2020 for Luis Rogelio Carranza-Lopez [20-9583] [Entered: 07/20/2020 12:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
