Kirk v. State of Oklahoma, et al
| JASON HICKS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA |
| SHANE JOSIAH KIRK |
| 21-6050 |
| April 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| <p>Kirk v. State of Oklahoma, et al.</p> |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10835741] Order filed by Clerk of the Court construing appellant's "motion for order" as a motion for extension of time to file the combined opening brief and application for certificate of appealability and granting the motion to 07/20/2021. Served on 06/09/2021. (See the attachment for the order.) [21-6050] [Entered: 06/09/2021 02:11 PM] |
| [10835370] Appellant's motion filed by Shane Josiah Kirk for order (construed as a motion for extension of time to file the combined opening brief and application for certificate of appealability. [21-6050] [Entered: 06/08/2021 11:41 AM] |
| [10833812] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 1, Comments: Volume I - Pleadings. [21-6050] [Entered: 06/02/2021 07:23 AM] |
| [10833475] Order filed by Clerk of the Court lifting the abatement of this appeal. Served on 06/01/2021. [21-6050] [Entered: 06/01/2021 08:22 AM] |
| [10833478] Jurisdictional review complete. Appellant's brief and Certificate of Appealability due 07/12/2021 for Shane Josiah Kirk. Record on appeal 10th circuit due 06/22/2021 [21-6050] [Entered: 06/01/2021 08:25 AM] |
| [10833184] Supplemental preliminary record filed. Contents: 5/27/21 district court order. [21-6050] [Entered: 05/28/2021 07:45 AM] |
| [10832934] Order filed by Clerk of the Court continuing the abatement of this appeal pending district court's ruling on Shane Josiah Kirks objection to the 4/8/21 order and judgment. Served on 05/27/2021. [21-6050] [Entered: 05/27/2021 08:43 AM] |
| [10830609] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying appellant's motion to waive requirement to show proof of service filed by Appellant Shane Josiah Kirk. Served on 05/17/2021. [21-6050] [Entered: 05/17/2021 03:44 PM] |
| [10830596] Appellant's motion filed by Shane Josiah Kirk to waive requirement to show proof of service. Served on 05/13/2021 (postmarked). Manner of Service: US mail. [21-6050] [Entered: 05/17/2021 03:22 PM] |
| [10830523] Entry of appearance filed by Shane Josiah Kirk. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 05/10/2021. Manner of Service: US mail [21-6050] [Entered: 05/17/2021 01:25 PM] |
| [10828817] Fee paid. Date paid in District Court on 05/07/2021. Text only entry; no document attached. [21-6050] [Entered: 05/11/2021 09:16 AM] |
| [10828852] Miscellanous correspondence received from Shane Josiah Kirk but not filed. Postmarked 05/05/2021. Manner of Service: US mail. [21-6050] [Entered: 05/11/2021 09:56 AM] |
| [10825325] Miscellaneous correspondence received from Shane Josiah Kirk but not filed. Served on 04/21/2021. Manner of Service: US mail. Clerk's response letter attached. [21-6050] [Entered: 04/26/2021 03:58 PM] |
| [10824450] Order filed by Clerk of the Court abating case pending district court's ruling on the objection filed 04/20/2021. The clerk of the district court shall transmit a supplemental preliminary record within five days after the district court enters its ruling. Please see attached order for additional information. Served on 04/22/2021. [21-6050] [Entered: 04/22/2021 09:55 AM] |
| [10824322] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 04/21/2021. Fee or IFP forms due in district court 05/21/2021 for Shane Josiah Kirk. Notice of appearance due on 05/21/2021 for Shane Josiah Kirk. [21-6050] [Entered: 04/21/2021 04:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
