Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Jackson v. Hicks et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Corey Jackson
Defendant:
Jason Hicks, Cortnie Siess, Melody Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendricks v. The City of East St. Louis Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv03349
Plaintiff:
Dorian Hendricks
Defendant:
The City of East St. Louis Police Department, The City of East St. Louis, Jason Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Stephens County Sheriff et al
as 5:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Juan Demetrius Hill and Juan-D Hill
Defendant:
Stephens County Sheriff, Oklahoma Attorney General, Govenor Kevin Stitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15436
Plaintiff:
JASON HICKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hicks v. Phillips County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jason Hicks
Defendant:
Phillips County Sheriff Department, Jeremy Bramlett and Neil Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAlister v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2021cv00696
Plaintiff:
Nickales McAlister
Defendant:
Stephens County, Wayne McKinney, Javier Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26951
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirk v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 21-6050
Respondent / Appellee:
JASON HICKS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHANE JOSIAH KIRK
Mitchell v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2021cv00265
Defendant:
Stephens County, Bobby Lewis, Michael Eades and others
Plaintiff:
Rocky W Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Stephens County et al
as 5:2021cv00266
Defendant:
Jerry Herburger, Stephens County, Bobby Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Rocky W Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
