Benavidez v. State of New Mexico, et al
| ERNESTO J. BENAVIDEZ |
| STATE OF NEW MEXICO, MICHELLE L. GRISHAM, Governor, BERNALILLO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW MEXICO CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONS and WEXFORD MEDICAL DEPARTMENT |
| 22-2048 |
| April 26, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [10917881] Mandate issued. [22-2048] [Entered: 06/06/2022 08:40 AM] |
| [10917878] Default;Procedural termination without judicial action by the Clerk of the Court. [22-2048] [Entered: 06/06/2022 08:39 AM] |
| [10908946] Order filed by Clerk of the Court. This matter is before the court on its own initiative for two purposes: first, to determine whether appellant must prepay the appellate filing fee before this appeal may proceed; and then, to determine whether summary dismissal of the appeal is appropriate in any event because it appears that appellant did not timely file his notice of apeal. Appellant's memorandum brief due 05/26/2022 for Ernesto J. Benavidez. Served on 04/26/2022. [22-2048] See order for details. [Entered: 04/26/2022 02:42 PM] |
| [10908838] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 04/26/2022. Notice of appearance due on 05/26/2022 for Ernesto J. Benavidez, and Notice of appearance due on 05/10/2022 for Bernalillo County District Attorney, Michelle L. Grisham, Guadalupe County Corrections, New Mexico Corrections Department and Wexford Medical Department. Fee or ifp forms due 05/26/2022 for Ernesto J. Benavidez. [22-2048] [Entered: 04/26/2022 11:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
