Cases 1 - 10 of 100
State of Calfornia et al v. Burgum et al
as 3:2026cv10071
Plaintiff:
State of Calfornia, State of Washington, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, Kevin Lilly, United States Fish And Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al v. United States Fish And Wildlife Service et al
as 4:2026cv10072
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of California, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
United States Fish And Wildlife Service, Brian Nesvik, Doug Burgum and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of California, et al v. Trump, et al
as 26-2038
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEVADA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Defendant:
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, in the official capacity as President of the United States, TODD BLANCHE, in the official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, U.S. ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION and others
Interested Party:
LOCAL ELECTION OFFICIALS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, REPUBLICAN PARTY OF ARIZONA, MARY ESTILL BUCHANAN, Former Secretary of State for the State of Colorado and others
State of California, et al v. State of Missouri, et al
as 26-2032
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Petitioner:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, SECURE FAMILIES INITIATIVE and others
State of California, et al v. USPS, et al
as 26-2031
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE, DAVID STEINER, in the official capacity as Postmaster General, Chief Executive Officer of the Postal Service, and Member of the Postal Service Board of Governors, DOUGLAS TULINO, in the official capacity as Deputy Postmaster General, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Human Resources Officer of the Postal Service and Member of the Postal Service Board of Governors and others
Petitioner:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, SECURE FAMILIES INITIATIVE and others
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al v. US Department of Education, et al
as 26-1973
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and LINDA MARIE MCMAHON, in the official capacity as Secretary of the US Department of Education
New Mexico Forward Party, et al v. Oliver, et al
as 26-2145
Plaintiff:
NEW MEXICO FORWARD PARTY, BOB PERLS, MICHAEL VIGIL and others
Defendant:
MAGGIE TOULOUSE OLIVER, in her official Capacity as Secretary of State of New Mexico and BARBARA DELANEY, in her official capacity as County Clerk of Luna County, New Mexico
Salazar v. State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2026cv02875
Plaintiff:
Ricky Salazar
Defendant:
State of New Mexico and RCC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
State of California, et al v. State of Missouri, et al
as 26-1991
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Petitioner:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, SECURE FAMILIES INITIATIVE and others
State of California, et al v. USPS, et al
as 26-1987
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE, DAVID STEINER, in the official capacity as Postmaster General, Chief Executive Officer of the Postal Service, and Member of the Postal Service Board of Governors, DOUGLAS TULINO, in the official capacity as Deputy Postmaster General, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Human Resources Officer of the Postal Service and Member of the Postal Service Board of Governors and others
Petitioner:
SOCIETY FOR RULE OF LAW INSTITUTE, LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, SECURE FAMILIES INITIATIVE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
