Williams v. State of Utah
| CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS |
| STATE OF UTAH |
| 23-4092 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| [11020191] Record on appeal filed. No. of Volumes: 2. Comments: Vols 1 & 2- pleadings. [23-4092] [Entered: 08/10/2023 11:02 AM] |
| [11019794] Jurisdictional review complete. Fee or IFP forms and appellant's combined opening brief and application for certificate of appealability due 09/18/2023 for Christopher Williams. Record on appeal due for 10th circuit 08/30/2023. [23-4092] [Entered: 08/09/2023 09:28 AM] |
| [11019184] Entry of appearance filed by Christopher Williams. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 08/07/2023. Manner of Service: email [23-4092] [Entered: 08/07/2023 12:24 PM] |
| [11018364] Attorney Tanner Hafen for State of Utah admitted to the bar of this court. [23-4092] [Entered: 08/03/2023 10:17 AM] |
| [11016225] Admissions letter sent. Response date set to 08/25/2023 for Tanner Hafen. [23-4092] [Entered: 07/26/2023 09:38 AM] |
| [11013976] Entry of appearance filed by Tanner Hafen for State of Utah. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 07/17/2023. Manner of Service: email [23-4092] [Entered: 07/17/2023 02:53 PM] |
| [11013807] Entry of appearance submitted by Daniel L. Day for Appellee State of Utah for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 07/17/2023. Manner of Service: US mail. [23-4092]--[Edited 07/17/2023 by DJD. Removed PDF as pleading filed 7/17/23] DLD [Entered: 07/17/2023 11:21 AM] |
| [11013813] Entry of appearance filed by Daniel Lee Day for State of Utah. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 07/17/2023. Manner of Service: US mail [23-4092] [Entered: 07/17/2023 11:31 AM] |
| [11013935] Entry of appearance submitted by Tanner R. Hafen for Appellee State of Utah for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: No. Served on 07/17/2023. Manner of Service: US mail. --[Edited 07/17/2023 by MLB to remove pdf from docket; entry filed on 07/17/2023][23-4092] TH [Entered: 07/17/2023 02:10 PM] |
| [11011890] Additional copy of Christopher Williams' notice of appeal (duplicate) received from David Glasscock (per envelope) but not filed. Served on 07/10/2023. Manner of Service: email. [23-4092] [Entered: 07/10/2023 12:37 PM] |
| [11011129] Prisoner case docketed. DATE RECEIVED: 07/06/2023. Fee or ifp forms and notice of appearance due 08/07/2023 for Christopher Williams. Notice of appearance due on 07/20/2023 for State of Utah. [23-4092] [Entered: 07/06/2023 12:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Williams v. State of Utah | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: STATE OF UTAH | |
| Represented By: | Tanner Hafen |
| Represented By: | Daniel Lee Day |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
