Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Newton v. State of Utah
as 2:2026cv00530
Petitioner:
Brian Newton
Respondent:
State of Utah
Unknown:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kane County, et al v. United States, et al
as 26-4072
Plaintiff:
KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision and STATE OF UTAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor:
SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. State of Utah, et al
as 26-4071
Plaintiff:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION
Defendant:
THE STATE OF UTAH, DUCHESNE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, DUCHESNE CITY, a municipal corporation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4068
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah v. State of Utah, et al
as 26-601
Petitioner:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION
Respondent:
THE STATE OF UTAH, DUCHESNE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, DUCHESNE CITY, a municipal corporation and others
LNU v. State of Utah
as 2:2026cv00404
Plaintiff:
FNU LNU
Defendant:
State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillman v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2026cv00379
Plaintiff:
Linda Gillman
Defendant:
State of Utah, Utah Department of Corrections, Jared Garcia and others
Unknown:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferraro v. Wall et al
as 2:2026cv00377
Defendant:
Carol Martin, Danielle Vizza, Cory Robert Wall and others
Plaintiff:
Michele Ferraro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyler v. 118th United States Congress, et al.
as 26-2513
Plaintiff:
MATHEW L. TYLER
Defendant:
118TH UNITED STATES CONGRESS, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DOJ - OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY - NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
