In re: Donald Hall
| In re: DONALD HALL |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA |
| 19-10881 |
| March 11, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: Motion for leave to file successive petition for habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Donald Hall is DENIED. [ # 8717403-2 ] GBT, RSR and JP [Entered: 04/02/2019 09:10 AM]
|
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. EMERGENCY Application for leave to file successive petition for habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Donald Hall. Served 03/07/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Required [Entered: 03/12/2019 03:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Donald Hall | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Undetermined: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA | |
| Represented By: | Ashley Moody |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: DONALD HALL | |
| Represented By: | Donald Hall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
