Cases 1 - 10 of 11,446
In re: Owen Denson, Jr.
as 24-13803
Petitioner:
In re: OWEN D. DENSON, JR.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Walter Knoeringer
as 24-13787
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
In re: WALTER J. KNOERINGER
Carroll Hartlove v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-13772
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
CARROLL HARTLOVE
In re: Venet Desir
as 24-13767
Petitioner:
In re: VENET DESIR
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Isaac Brown v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-13768
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
ISAAC BROWN
Christopher Seckington v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-13739
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER SECKINGTON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Renelle LubinIn re: Renelle Lubin
as 24-13669
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
In re: RENELLE LUBIN
Richard Roberts v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-13670
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
RICHARD A. ROBERTS
Upside Foods Inc v. Commissioner, Florida Department of Agriculture an, et al
as 24-13640
Defendant:
STATE ATTORNEY, THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, STATE ATTORNEY OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, COMMISSIONER, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
UPSIDE FOODS INC
Reeves, William v. Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida et al
as 1:2024cv24332
Defendant:
Larry A Johnson, Riverside County Court, Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida and others
Plaintiff:
William Morgan Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
