In re: Bobby Marshall
In re: BOBBY LEE MARSHALL |
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA |
19-11267 |
April 5, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Change of Address [Entered: 05/20/2019 11:51 AM] |
ORDER: Motion for leave to file successive petition for habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Bobby Lee Marshall is DISMISSED. [ # 8739449-2 ] CRW, KCN and JEC [Entered: 04/24/2019 09:06 AM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. EMERGENCY Application for leave to file successive petition for habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Bobby Lee Marshall. Served 04/01/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Required [Entered: 04/08/2019 11:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Bobby Marshall | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: BOBBY LEE MARSHALL | |
Represented By: | Bobby Lee Marshall |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Not yet classified: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA | |
Represented By: | Ashley Moody |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.