Randy Edwards v. State of Georgia, et al
GREG DOZIER, Commissioner, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF GEORGIA |
RANDY EDWARDS |
19-11543 |
April 23, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTION Motion for en banc review filed by Appellant Randy Edwards. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8796638-1] [Entered: 06/11/2019 12:17 PM] |
Notice of filing: Notice of scrivener's error as to Appellant Randy Edwards. [Entered: 06/11/2019 12:21 PM] |
Public Communication: Letter from Pro Se Appellant requesting status of appeal. [Entered: 05/28/2019 02:37 PM] |
MOTION Motion challengng void judgments and Request for Expedited En Banc Review. filed by Appellant Randy Edwards. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8777373-1] [Entered: 05/20/2019 01:06 PM] |
Notice of Change of Address for Party Randy Edwards, from Dodge SP to Jenkins CC. [Entered: 05/20/2019 11:55 AM] |
Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Randy Edwards. [Entered: 05/20/2019 11:43 AM] |
NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Randy Edwards. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/08/2019 02:53 PM] |
HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Randy Edwards on 04/11/2019. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/25/2019 01:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.