Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Fripp v. Unknown
as 3:2026cv00061
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Fripp
Respondent:
Unknown
Unknown:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of Georgia
as 1:2026cv05178
Petitioner:
Mark A. Williams
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schofield v. State of Georgia
as 1:2026cv05175
Petitioner:
Randall Schofield
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daker v. Oliver et al
as 4:2026cv00268
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Commisioner Tyrone Oliver, Former Commissioner Gregory Dozier, Former Commissioner Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. State of Georgia
as 4:2026cv00264
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Rodriguez
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Long
as 4:2026cv00234
Petitioner:
Orlando Gonzales
Respondent:
Michael Long
Unknown:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Jeffrey Moore
as 26-13130
Petitioner:
In re: JEFFREY D. MOORE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
In re: Valentino Jackson
as 26-13083
Petitioner:
In re: VALENTINO JACKSON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Marrow v. Illa et al
as 4:2026cv00229
Petitioner:
Keith Marrow, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden G. Illa and Hays State Prison
Unknown:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coggins v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2026cv04915
Plaintiff:
Jerome Isaac Coggins
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, The Superior Court, the Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
