Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 39
L. M. v. Town of Middleborough, Massachusetts, et al
as 23-1645
Plaintiff / Appellant: L. M., a minor by and through his father and stepmother and natural guardians, Christopher and Susan Morrison
Defendant / Appellee: MIDDLEBOROUGH, MA, MIDDLEBOROUGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE, CAROLYN J. LYONS, Superintendent, Middleborough Public Schools, in her official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: INSTITUTE FOR FAITH AND FAMILY, PARENTS DEFENDING EDUCATION, FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MASSACHUSETTS
United States, ex rel. Lovell & Mckusick, et al v. Athenahealth, Inc.
as 22-1245
Plaintiff: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES, Ex. Rel Cheryl Lovell and William McKusick, CHERYL LOVELL, Relator and WILLIAM MCKUSICK, Relator
Defendant / Appellee: ATHENAHEALTH, INC.
United States, ex rel. Sanborn v. Athenahealth, Inc.
as 22-1246
Plaintiff: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GEORDIE SANBORN and GEORDIE SANBORN, Relator
Defendant / Appellee: ATHENAHEALTH, INC.
US, ex rel. Nargol & Langton, et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 22-1182
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTONI NARGOL, Relator and DAVID LANGTON, Relator
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., Known now as Medical Device Business Services, Inc., DEPUY, INC., Known now as DePuy Synthes, Inc. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
US, ex rel. Nargol & Langton, et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al
as 22-1047
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTONI NARGOL, Relator and DAVID LANGTON, Relator
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., Known now as Medical Device Business Services, Inc., DEPUY, INC., Known now as DePuy Synthesis, Inc., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Bergeron v. Unknown Agents of The State of Georgia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv11729
Defendant: Unknown Agents of The State of Georgia
Plaintiff: Jacob Bergeron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia-Sanchez et al v. State of Georgia et al
as 3:2018cv01954
Defendant: L.T.S. Brown, Health Department, LT Reliford and others
Plaintiff: Israel Garcia-Sanchez and C.O. Ogun Fowokon
Respondent: Rober A. Deyton and State of Georgia and its representatives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. MALLINCKRODT ARD LLC
as 1:2018cv11931
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Florida and others
Defendant: MALLINCKRODT PHARMACEUTICALS INC., MALLINCKRODT ARD LLC, QUESTCOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Gould, et al v. Morgan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2202
Amicus Curiae: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: COMMONWEALTH SECOND AMENDMENT, INC., CHRISTOPHER HART, SARAH ZESCH and others
Defendant / Appellee: DANIEL C. O'LEARY, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the Brookline Police Department, WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Boston Police Department, MARK MORGAN, Acting Chief of the Brookline Police Department and others
Petitioner: ALAN B. MORRISON and JACK RAKOVE
Plaintiff: IRWIN CRUZ and MARKUS VALLASTER
Defendant: DAVID A. PROVENCHER, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the New Bedford Police Department
Leysock v. Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 17-1538
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIMOTHY LEYSOCK, Ex Rel
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Defendant - Appellee: FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?