Darryl Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
Respondent / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant: DARRYL JOHNSON
Case Number: 19-13689
Filed: September 19, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2019 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Sonya Roebuck Horbelt for Appellees Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [19-13689] (ECF: Sonya Horbelt) [Entered: 11/07/2019 12:19 PM]
November 6, 2019 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Sonya Roebuck Horbelt for Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida and Ashley Moody for Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 11/06/2019 03:04 PM]
October 10, 2019 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Darryl Johnson. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [8904046-1] [Entered: 10/10/2019 12:14 PM]
October 3, 2019 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Darryl Johnson. [Entered: 10/07/2019 10:19 AM]
September 20, 2019 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Darryl Johnson was filed on 08/28/2019. Docket Entry 16. [Entered: 09/20/2019 11:10 AM]
September 19, 2019 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Darryl Johnson on 09/16/2019. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 09/20/2019 11:05 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Darryl Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Represented By: Sonya Roebuck Horbelt
Represented By: Ashley Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Sonya Roebuck Horbelt
Represented By: Ashley Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: DARRYL JOHNSON
Represented By: Darryl Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?