Taimark Dickson v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
Respondent / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant: TAIMARK DICKSON
Case Number: 20-10792
Filed: February 27, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2020 NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN Same as entry 8. Notice of receipt: Cover letter as to Appellant Taimark Dickson. [Entered: 04/21/2020 03:47 PM]
April 17, 2020 NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN Appellant dd not request anything. Notice of receipt: Appellant is in confinement as to Appellant Taimark Dickson. [Entered: 04/20/2020 02:41 PM]
April 14, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER: On its own motion, the court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction (see attached order for complete text). BBM, JP and KCN [Entered: 04/14/2020 09:27 AM]
March 19, 2020 Returned Mail was received for Party Taimark Dickson. Address has been verified and updated, and mail has been re-sent. IN RE: 2/28 & HAB 4 [Entered: 03/31/2020 03:52 PM]
March 6, 2020 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Jonathan S. Tannen for Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections. [20-10792] (ECF: Jonathan Tannen) [Entered: 03/06/2020 10:55 AM]
March 6, 2020 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Jonathan S. Tannen for Appellees Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-10792] (ECF: Jonathan Tannen) [Entered: 03/06/2020 10:42 AM]
February 28, 2020 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Taimark Dickson. [Entered: 03/02/2020 04:27 PM]
February 27, 2020 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Taimark Dickson was filed on 11/26/2019. Docket Entry 24. [Entered: 02/28/2020 01:42 PM]
February 27, 2020 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Taimark Dickson on 02/27/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 02/28/2020 01:39 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Taimark Dickson v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Represented By: Jonathan S. Tannen
Represented By: Ashley Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Jonathan S. Tannen
Represented By: Ashley Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: TAIMARK DICKSON
Represented By: Taimark Dickson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?