Shannon Copeland v. FBI Director, et al
| U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, RON DESANTIS, Governor, RICHARD L. SWEARINGEN, FDLE Commissioner, FBI DIRECTOR and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA |
| SHANNON COPELAND |
| 20-11444 |
| April 14, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Shannon Copeland has failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court within the time fixed by the rules. [Entered: 05/14/2020 03:14 PM] |
| Amended Notice of Appeal filed by Party Shannon Copeland. [Entered: 05/04/2020 03:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Emily M. Smachetti for FBI Director, Richard L. Swearingen and U.S. Attorney General. [20-11444] (ECF: Emily Smachetti) [Entered: 04/21/2020 03:13 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Emily M. Smachetti for USA Ariana Fajardo Orshan. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-11444] (ECF: Emily Smachetti) [Entered: 04/21/2020 02:21 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Shannon Copeland on 04/14/2020. Fee Status: PLRA 3 Strikes. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/17/2020 12:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
