Charles Givens v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
Respondent / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant: CHARLES GIVENS
Case Number: 20-14112
Filed: November 3, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER: Motion for extension to file motion for COA filed by Appellant Charles Givens is GRANTED by clerk. [ # 9249696-2 ] to 01/11/2021. [Entered: 12/10/2020 05:32 PM]
November 20, 2020 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Charles Givens. [Entered: 12/01/2020 04:52 PM]
November 20, 2020 MOTION for extension of time, thirty (30) days, to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability filed by Appellant Charles Givens. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9249696-1] [Entered: 12/01/2020 04:56 PM]
November 20, 2020 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Charles Givens. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9249690-1] [Entered: 12/01/2020 04:50 PM]
November 17, 2020 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Pamela J. Koller for Appellees Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, the party filing it must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-2(b). [20-14112] (ECF: Pamela Koller) [Entered: 11/17/2020 11:28 AM]
November 17, 2020 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Pamela J. Koller for Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections. [20-14112] (ECF: Pamela Koller) [Entered: 11/17/2020 11:27 AM]
November 3, 2020 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Charles Givens was filed on 09/29/2020. Docket Entry 24. [Entered: 11/04/2020 09:38 AM]
November 3, 2020 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Charles Givens on 11/02/2020. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 11/04/2020 09:32 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Charles Givens v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Represented By: Pamela J. Koller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Represented By: Pamela J. Koller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: CHARLES GIVENS
Represented By: Charles Givens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?