Deron Mahone v. State of Georgia, et al
| CHRISTY PAPAY, MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA, COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT, COLUMBUS GEORGIA, ZACHERY STEWART, STATE OF GEORGIA, KYLE VAN NOY and WESLEY LAMBERTUS |
| DERON DEVAUGHN MAHONE |
| 20-14752 |
| December 18, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Deron Devaughn Mahone v. Zachery Stewart, et al. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Deron Devaughn Mahone. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9286914-1] [Entered: 01/20/2021 08:14 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Deron Devaughn Mahone. [Entered: 01/19/2021 07:54 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed filed by Appellant Deron Devaughn Mahone. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9285455-1] [Entered: 01/19/2021 07:59 AM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Alex M. Shalishali for Appellees Columbus Consolidated Government, Christy Papay, Zachary Stewart and Kyle Van Noy. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [20-14752] (ECF: Stephen Gunby) [Entered: 01/13/2021 12:36 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Deron Devaughn Mahone. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 01/05/2021 07:30 AM] |
| USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees Assessed. Filed on 12/23/2020. Docket Entry 53. [Entered: 12/29/2020 02:57 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Angela Ellen Cusimano for State of Georgia and Wesley Lambertus. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [20-14752] (ECF: Angela Cusimano) [Entered: 12/28/2020 11:27 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Angela Ellen Cusimano for the State of Georgia and Wesley Lambertus [20-14752] (ECF: Angela Cusimano) [Entered: 12/28/2020 11:22 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Roger Chalmers for the State of Georgia and Wesley Lambertus Roger A. Chalmers for Wesley Lambertus. [20-14752] (ECF: Roger Chalmers) [Entered: 12/22/2020 09:29 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Alex M. Shalishali for Columbus Georgia, Columbus Police Department, Muscogee County Georgia, Christy Papay, Zachery Stewart and Kyle Van Noy. [20-14752] (ECF: Alex Shalishali) [Entered: 12/22/2020 01:24 PM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Thomas F. Gristina for All Appellee [20-14752] (ECF: Thomas Gristina) [Entered: 12/22/2020 01:28 PM] |
| USDC Motion filed by appellant for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees or consent form. Filed on 12/18/2020. Docket Entry 51. [Entered: 12/21/2020 02:40 PM] |
| PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Deron Devaughn Mahone on 12/18/2020. Fee Status: IFP Pending 12/18/2020. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 12/21/2020 02:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
