Steve Morris v. State of Georgia
| STATE OF GEORGIA |
| STEVE A. MORRIS |
| 20-14785 |
| December 23, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of receipt: letter / motion for IFP as to Appellant Steve A. Morris. No action will be taken because this appeal is closed. [Entered: 02/18/2021 02:18 PM] |
ORDER: On its own motion, the Court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Any outstanding motions are DENIED as moot. [ # 9296503-2 ], [ # 9296486-2 ]. CRW, RSR and ALB (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 02/03/2021 04:30 PM]
|
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Steve A. Morris was filed on 01/28/2021. Docket Entry 38. [Entered: 01/29/2021 08:44 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Steve A. Morris. [Entered: 01/29/2021 04:31 PM] |
| MOTION for review filed by Appellant Steve A. Morris. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9296503-1] [Entered: 01/29/2021 04:34 PM] |
| MOTION to accept C.D.C. data filed by Appellant Steve A. Morris. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9296486-1] [Entered: 01/29/2021 04:29 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Christopher Michael Carr for State of Georgia. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP) via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 01/25/2021 07:56 AM] |
| Notice of receipt: Letter / Statement as to Appellant Steve A. Morris. [Entered: 01/22/2021 08:47 AM] |
| Amended Notice of Appeal filed by Party Steve A. Morris. [Entered: 01/20/2021 09:22 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Steve A. Morris. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 01/12/2021 12:32 PM] |
| Notice of receipt: letter / statement as to Appellant Steve A. Morris. [Entered: 01/08/2021 11:28 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Steve A. Morris on 12/23/2020 USDC motion pending: Motion for IFP filed on 12/23/2020. DE# 28. Fee Status: IFP Pending. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 12/28/2020 10:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Steve Morris v. State of Georgia | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: STATE OF GEORGIA | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Michael Carr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: STEVE A. MORRIS | |
| Represented By: | Steve A. Morris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
