Darian Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
Respondent / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant: DARIAN KEITH DAVIS
Case Number: 21-10171
Filed: January 15, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2021 MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from the notice of appeal filed by Appellant Darian Keith Davis. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9324096-1] [Entered: 03/04/2021 08:57 AM]
February 18, 2021 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Darian Keith Davis. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9324082-1] [Entered: 03/04/2021 08:52 AM]
February 18, 2021 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Darian Keith Davis. [Entered: 03/04/2021 08:43 AM]
February 18, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Florida Attorney General Service for Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/18/2021 12:59 PM]
February 18, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Darian Keith Davis. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 02/18/2021 12:57 PM]
January 21, 2021 USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Darian Keith Davis was filed on 12/11/2020. Docket Entry 11. [Entered: 01/21/2021 07:37 AM]
January 15, 2021 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Darian Keith Davis on 01/14/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 01/21/2021 07:33 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Darian Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: DARIAN KEITH DAVIS
Represented By: Darian Keith Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?