Vinodh Raghubir v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
| ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| VINODH RAGHUBIR |
| 21-10478 |
| February 11, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Vinodh Raghubir failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 03/30/2021 10:27 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Florida Attorney General Service for Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 03/12/2021 08:41 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA and denying IFP as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir was filed on 01/20/2021. Docket Entry 14. [Entered: 02/18/2021 08:18 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Vinodh Raghubir on 02/11/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 02/18/2021 08:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
