In re: Patrick Murphy
In re: PATRICK LYNWOOD MURPHY |
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA |
21-11088 |
April 1, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER: Motion for leave to file successive petition for habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Patrick Lynwood Murphy is DENIED. [ # 9351972-2 ] BBM, KCN and BL (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 04/09/2021 10:34 AM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. EMERGENCY Application for leave to file successive petition for habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Patrick Lynwood Murphy. Served 03/25/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Required [Entered: 04/06/2021 10:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Patrick Murphy | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA | |
Represented By: | Florida Attorney General Service |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: PATRICK LYNWOOD MURPHY | |
Represented By: | Patrick Lynwood Murphy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.