In re: Lee Lewis, Jr.
In re: LEE ANDREWS LEWIS, JR. |
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA |
21-11462 |
April 29, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Removed from case: Attorney Ashley Moody for Successive Habeas Respondent Attorney General, State of Florida in 21-11462. [Entered: 05/03/2021 02:36 PM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING DOCKETED. EMERGENCY Application for leave to file successive petition for habeas corpus filed by Petitioner Lee Andrews Lewis, Jr.. Served 04/25/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Required [Entered: 05/03/2021 08:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Lee Lewis, Jr. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: LEE ANDREWS LEWIS, JR. | |
Represented By: | Lee Andrews Lewis Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA | |
Represented By: | Florida Attorney General |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.