Thomas Richardson v. Attorney General, State of Fl., et al
| SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA |
| THOMAS C. RICHARDSON |
| 21-11563 |
| May 7, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Thomas C. Richardson. [Entered: 06/21/2021 04:12 PM] |
| This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in the District Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 06/02/2021 05:00 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Thomas C. Richardson. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 05/24/2021 10:29 AM] |
| USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Thomas C. Richardson was filed on 04/05/2021. Docket Entry 15. [Entered: 05/10/2021 04:56 PM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Thomas C. Richardson on 05/06/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 05/10/2021 04:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
