Clarence Dees v. Lamar, et al
Defendant / Appellee: THOMAS, LAMAR, C. JOHNSON, MCCOVERY and ROSEMAN
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE DEES
Case Number: 21-11967
Filed: June 8, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2021 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees Assessed. Filed on 07/15/2021. Docket Entry 26. [Entered: 07/16/2021 12:57 PM]
July 12, 2021 Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Clarence Dees. [Entered: 07/15/2021 10:20 AM]
June 28, 2021 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Clarence Dees. [Entered: 06/29/2021 04:51 PM]
June 25, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Clarence Dees. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 06/25/2021 02:58 PM]
June 25, 2021 USDC Order - Appellant has been ordered to file a consent form and/or certified financial statement within 30 days. Filed on 06/09/2021. Docket Entry 21. [Entered: 06/25/2021 11:07 AM]
June 8, 2021 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Clarence Dees on 05/28/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 06/14/2021 08:28 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Clarence Dees v. Lamar, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: THOMAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LAMAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: C. JOHNSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MCCOVERY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ROSEMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CLARENCE DEES
Represented By: Clarence Dees
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?