Cases 1 - 10 of 100
CARLAN v. CITY OF BYRON GEORGIA et al
as 5:2026cv00228
Plaintiff:
REVERAND JAMES THOMAS CARLAN
Defendant:
CITY OF BYRON GEORGIA, MAYOR MICHAEL CHIDESTER, MICHAEL A CHUMBLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. FCC Allenwood LSCI Warden
as 3:2026cv01541
Petitioner:
Omar Thomas
Respondent:
FCC Allenwood LSCI Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Axos Clearing LLC v. Acquarulo et al
as 1:2026cv04796
Petitioner:
Axos Clearing LLC
Respondent:
Joseph Acquarulo, Arnold B. Anderson, Michael Backus and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 12 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Miles v. GOOGLE, LLC
as 4:2026cv04468
Plaintiff:
Thomas Miles
Defendant:
GOOGLE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Silicon Dales Ltd et al v. Stride, Inc.
as 1:2026cv01568
Plaintiff:
Silicon Dales Ltd, Robin Scott, Thomas Morton and others
Defendant:
Stride, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
OLIVER v. CITY OF POOLER et al
as 5:2026cv00224
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY OLIVER
Defendant:
CITY OF POOLER, LOGANS ROADHOUSE II LLC, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Albertsons et al
as 3:2026cv01851
Plaintiff:
Dianne Thomas
Defendant:
Albertsons, Albertsons LLC d/b/a Albertsons Store #4133 and Red Bull Distribution Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
