Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Bishop v. Family Dollar, LLC
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bishop
Defendant:
Family Dollar, LLC
North Dakota Human Rights Coalition et al v. Patriot Front et al
as 3:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
North Dakota Human Rights Coalition, Immigrant Development Center and Plaintiff Doe
Defendant:
Patriot Front, Thomas Rousseau, Trevor Valescu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Wilansky v. Bakke et al
as 3:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Sophia Wilansky
Defendant:
Paul D. Bakke, Thomas M. Grosz, Matthew J. Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ree v. Belcourt School District et al
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Emerson Joe Ree
Defendant:
Belcourt School District, Michelle Thomas, Melvin Laducer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Thomas v. Sayler
as 1:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Allen Charles Thomas
Respondent:
Warden James Sayler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knitter v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Michael John Thomas Knitter, MD
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Olson v. Queen City Pizza, LLC
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Thomas Olson
Defendant:
Queen City Pizza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bohman v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Bohman
Defendant:
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tiegs et al v. Vilsack et al
as 3:2021cv00147
Plaintiff:
James Tiegs, Abraham Jergenson, Cally Jergenson and others
Defendant:
Thomas J. Vilsack and Zach Ducheneaux
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
