Vinodh Raghubir v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Case Number: 21-12522
Filed: July 28, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2021 Notice of Mandatory ECF sent to Vinodh Raghubir. [Entered: 09/23/2021 02:53 PM]
September 16, 2021 MOTION to reinstate appeal filed by Mr. Vinodh Raghubir. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9485508-1] [21-12522] (ECF: Vinodh Raghubir) [Entered: 09/16/2021 12:06 PM]
September 16, 2021 Notice of receipt: Motion to Reinstate Appeal as to Appellant Mr. Vinodh Raghubir. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN because the deficiency has not been satisfied. [Entered: 09/23/2021 02:47 PM]
September 13, 2021 Notice of receipt: Notice of Related Cases as to Appellant Mr. Vinodh Raghubir. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN ECF Filer. [Entered: 09/23/2021 02:52 PM]
September 13, 2021 ENTRY OF DISMISSAL: Pursuant to the 11th Cir.R.42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Mr. Vinodh Raghubir failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 09/13/2021 02:12 PM]
August 25, 2021 Notice of receipt: Copy of Notice of Related Cases, Objection, Motion to Vacate, Clarify, Reinstate, Notice of Acceptance of Waiver of Jurisdiction, and Motion to Waive Filing Fees with Affidavit of Indigency as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir filed in the DC on 8/30/2021. [Entered: 09/02/2021 02:17 PM]
August 20, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Vinodh Raghubir. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 08/20/2021 11:49 AM]
July 29, 2021 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Vinodh Raghubir was filed on 06/23/2021. Docket Entry 8. [Entered: 07/29/2021 09:55 AM]
July 28, 2021 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Vinodh Raghubir on 07/26/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 07/29/2021 09:42 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Vinodh Raghubir v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: VINODH RAGHUBIR
Represented By: Vinodh Raghubir
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?