Roderick Lewis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
| RODERICK B. LEWIS |
| SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA |
| 21-12549 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Roderick Bernard Lewis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for certificate of appealability construed from "Notice of Appeal" filed by Appellant Roderick B. Lewis. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9481399-1] [Entered: 09/10/2021 03:45 PM] |
| Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Roderick B. Lewis. The appellant's brief is due on or before 10/12/2021. [Entered: 09/01/2021 08:59 AM] |
| Appellate fee was paid on 08/31/2021 as to Appellant Roderick B. Lewis. [Entered: 09/01/2021 07:47 AM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Roderick B. Lewis. [Entered: 08/16/2021 04:37 PM] |
| USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Roderick B. Lewis was filed on 08/04/2021. Docket Entry 13. [Entered: 08/05/2021 11:32 AM] |
| USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Roderick B. Lewis was filed on 07/28/2021. Docket Entry 11. [Entered: 07/30/2021 07:24 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Roderick B. Lewis on 07/28/2021 07/28/2021. Fee Status: IFP Pending. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 07/30/2021 07:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
