Charles Hartman v. Paulding County Sheriff, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHARLES HARTMAN
Defendant / Appellee: PAULDING COUNTY SHERIFF, THOMAS, ELLINGTON, WINKELS and GLAMOR
Case Number: 21-13559
Filed: October 12, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2021 Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Charles Hartman. [Entered: 12/02/2021 09:10 AM]
November 22, 2021 USDC Order Granting appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 11/16/2021. Docket Entry 23. [Entered: 11/22/2021 08:03 AM]
November 12, 2021 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Charles Hartman. [Entered: 11/15/2021 03:01 PM]
November 8, 2021 Notice of receipt: CIP as to Appellant Charles Hartman. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN because it is not filled out correctly. [Entered: 11/10/2021 10:02 AM]
November 3, 2021 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Charles Hartman. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. [Entered: 11/03/2021 09:00 AM]
October 12, 2021 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Charles Hartman on 10/08/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 10/18/2021 11:08 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Charles Hartman v. Paulding County Sheriff, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHARLES HARTMAN
Represented By: Charles Hartman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PAULDING COUNTY SHERIFF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: THOMAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ELLINGTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WINKELS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GLAMOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?