Reo Nance v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
| REO THOMAS NANCE |
| SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA |
| 21-14513 |
| December 30, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for extension of time to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability to 03/28/2022, for extension of time to file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis to 03/28/2022 filed by Reo Thomas Nance. Opposition to Motion is Unknown. [9606524-1] [21-14513] (ECF: Rachael Reese) [Entered: 02/25/2022 01:49 PM] |
| Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Rachael Elizabeth Reese for Appellant Reo Thomas Nance. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [21-14513] (ECF: Rachael Reese) [Entered: 02/09/2022 10:51 AM] |
| APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Rachael Elizabeth Reese for Reo Thomas Nance. [21-14513] (ECF: Rachael Reese) [Entered: 02/09/2022 10:51 AM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Florida Attorney General Service for Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida and Linsey Corrine Sims-Bohnenstiel for Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 02/01/2022 04:08 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Rachael Elizabeth Reese for Reo Thomas Nance. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 01/26/2022 06:31 PM] |
| USDC order denying COA and IFP as to Appellant Reo Thomas Nance was filed on 11/30/2021. Docket Entry 13.--[Edited 01/26/2022 by LA] [Entered: 01/03/2022 11:44 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Reo Thomas Nance on 12/29/2021. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 01/03/2022 11:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
